Thursday, 5 April 2012

The Woman in Black (2012)



Dir: James Watkins

Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Ciaran Hinds, Sophie Stuckey

                Susan Hill’s famous ghost story gets another adaptation, this time on the big screen courtesy of classic horror production company Hammer.
                Arthur Kipps (Daniel Radcliffe) is a young lawyer whose wife died in child birth. A few years later he is still struggling with the loss. His work has been suffering and his boss gives him a last chance. He sends him to a mansion to sort out the papers of a deceased woman in a small village. However, Arthur starts seeing figures around the supposedly deserted mansion.
                The classic ghost story is a genre which is rarely seen nowadays in horror, a genre which has become overcrowded by torture horror, pointless remakes and found footage movies, so it is a nice relief to for such a film to be out as such a high profile release.
                The Woman in Black is quite an old and well known story so some of it does feel familiar. The outsider city man coming to a small village, the villagers being against him and trying to make him leave, people hiding secrets and bad things happening to children are all clichés which we’ve seen many times before but the familiarity doesn’t drag the film down. It manages to create a fairly creepy atmosphere; the scenes of Arthur Kipps alone at the house are particularly tense. However, it spoils the atmosphere by going for the loud noise jump scares so often favoured in modern horror films. The scares mostly come from glimpses of things in the background or behind Arthur, be they a moving figure or ever just a face, and these would work well to build up an almost unbearable atmosphere if they were backed with sparse soundtrack but the film spoils it slightly by going for the shock. This may cause an instant reaction from the audience but it dispels some of the tension that’s been built up. The effective horror films are the ones that leave you with an ominous feeling once you’ve left the cinema, they leave you fidgety and on edge, not the ones that you look back on and say it made you jump. A pigeon can make you jump but they don’t leave you scared.
                Another problem with the film is the casting of Daniel Radcliffe. His acting is perfectly good but he never seems old enough for the role. You never really believe that he is a widowed father; he seems more like the young child’s older brother. This doesn’t become a problem when we are left with Radcliffe in the mansion but it will be a nagging thought left in your head.
                The film realises its setting effectively and all the actors play their roles well. The build up of tension in the mansion at night is genuinely effective and the scares can make you jump, you just wish there was more to the horror.
                A good attempt at a classic ghost story which unfortunately still relies too much on loud noises and jump shocks. It is often creepy but rarely truly scary. It ends up as an entertaining watch but pretty forgettable. More atmosphere and less jumps for the next ghost story please.

3 out of 5 Buttons

No comments:

Post a Comment